home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: dnaco.net!root
- From: rmartin@pmci.com (Rod Martin)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
- Subject: Re: There is *NO* Amiga Emulation!
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 16:53:09 GMT
- Organization: The Dayton Network Access Company (DNACo)
- Message-ID: <4gi78b$k51@sisko.dnaco.net>
- References: <DMEn9F.I1A@hermes.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de> <4fb92m$aqb@nntp.texas.net> <philw-0902961334030001@philw.users.xplor.com> <641.6614T680T2569@burst.demon.co.uk> <4fk5e9$bni@nntp.texas.net> <499.6616T1152T2460@academy.bastad.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: @radium.pmci.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- anderse@academy.bastad.se (Anders Erlandsson) wrote:
-
-
- >Thomas Weeks wrote about Re: There is *NO* Amiga Emulation!:
-
- >>: > Since when did the C-64 use a Motorala CPU?
-
- >>: The C64 used to use a 6502 processor, AFAIK that was a hybrid of the 6500
- >>: from Motorola
-
- >>Thank you!
-
- >Actually it not 6502 but 6510.
-
-
- First I would like to let everyone know I am a dedicated user of
- Amiga, in fact I have programmed a BBS for it. But I have checked
- out the emulator on my Pentium 100 here at work and I must admit even
- though it was slow I was impressed! Everyone keeps slaming the
- people who created the emulator and it's various ports. You need to
- look at it this way.... look at the talent required to create such an
- application. Anytime you emulate a totally different processor via
- software its gonna be slower than the real thing. I do believe they
- can and probably will find ways of speeding it up. It would be nice
- to run my favorit Amiga apps here on my work PC! So as a programmers
- perspective, to the developers of the Amiga emulator GOOD JOB! I
- just wish I was as good as a programmer as that!
-
-
-
-
-